Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
For a statewide health-IT convener, equity is not only a value for how we work — it is the mission itself. Interoperability has to serve every Arizonan, or it does not serve the state.
Arizona
Equity as a value, and as the work
Diversity, equity, and inclusion mean two things at AzHeC, and we hold both. The first is organizational: who sits at the neutral table, whose voices shape its decisions, and whether the council reflects the breadth of the state it serves. The second is the harder one — whether the health-IT infrastructure Arizona builds actually reaches the people most often left behind.
Connected care can narrow health disparities or widen them. When broadband, devices, and digitized records concentrate in well-resourced systems, the digital divide becomes a health divide. The council exists to push the other way: toward exchange that includes rural counties, tribal nations, multilingual communities, and small providers as first-class participants rather than afterthoughts.
Equity by design in interoperability
The digital divide is a health-equity problem
Remote rural areas and Native American tribal communities face the largest broadband gaps in the country, because private infrastructure providers have little incentive to serve sparsely populated regions. The same pattern repeats in historically under-invested urban communities — a phenomenon researchers now call digital redlining. Where the connectivity is thin, the benefits of health information exchange arrive last, if at all.
Closing that gap is not only about access to a network. A useful framework describes digital health equity as five interdependent conditions — access, availability, adequacy, acceptability, and affordability — meaning a tool must not only exist but be reachable, reliable, usable, culturally appropriate, and within reach financially. AzHeC applies that lens when it weighs in on standards and exchange models for Arizona.
Equity in the data and the standard
Equity also lives inside the technical layer most people never see. Data standards are written and maintained by professional bodies such as HL7, and the choice to include or exclude data elements relevant to a given population directly determines whether a community's outcomes can even be measured. A standard that has no field for a relevant characteristic renders the disparity invisible. The council treats representative, equity-aware data standards as a precondition for measuring progress — not a nicety.
Our focus areas
These are the places where the council concentrates its equity work — each chosen because it is where interoperability most often either includes or excludes the people Arizona most needs it to reach.
01Rural Arizona
Continuity of care across long distances depends on records that travel. We prioritize the connectivity, reliability, and exchange models that make a statewide HIE meaningful in counties where the nearest specialist may be hours away.
Read more
02Tribal & Indigenous health
Tribal nations have distinct data-sovereignty interests and some of the widest connectivity gaps in the state. We engage as partners and convene with respect for tribal authority over health data, not as a body acting upon communities.
03Multilingual & culturally relevant care
Acceptability is part of access. We support patient-facing exchange and consent experiences that work for Arizona's many languages and cultural contexts, because a tool that isn't understood isn't usable.
04Small & safety-net providers
Federally qualified health centers, rural clinics, and small practices serve disproportionate shares of underserved patients with the lightest IT resources. We favor lower-burden integration paths so they are not priced out of connected care.
Read more
05Equity-aware data standards
We advocate for data elements and standards that let disparities be measured rather than erased, so that progress toward equity is something Arizona can actually track.
06Inclusive convening
A neutral table is only neutral if everyone is at it. We work to ensure the council's membership, committees, and consultations reflect the full diversity of Arizona's health community.
Read moreInteroperability that reaches only the well-connected does not close Arizona's health gaps — it deepens them. Equity by design means building the network for the patient who is hardest to reach first.— The Arizona Health Interoperability Council
How equity shows up in our work
Equity at AzHeC is procedural, not decorative. It enters the council's process at specific, repeatable points.
We ask the access question early
Before endorsing an exchange model or standard, we ask who it reaches and who it leaves out — across the five conditions of access, availability, adequacy, acceptability, and affordability.
We design with communities, not for them
Participatory engagement with rural, tribal, and underserved stakeholders shapes our guidance, so that tools are contextually relevant rather than imposed.
We protect the ability to measure
We push for data standards that preserve the population data needed to see disparities, because what cannot be measured cannot be closed.
We keep the table representative
We treat the diversity of our own convening as an ongoing responsibility, reviewed alongside our governance.
Equity work is never finished
If your organization serves communities that connected care too often overlooks — rural, tribal, multilingual, or safety-net — we want you at the table. Tell us where the gaps are.