Skip to main content
Menu
Language
Appearance
The Arizona Health Interoperability Council
Connected Devices

Smart & connected medical devices

Infusion pumps, bedside monitors, ventilators and connected wearables now produce a near-continuous stream of clinical data. This page explains how those devices expose their readings, the standards that name and carry the data, and the integration patterns that move a value from device to record automatically.

What "connected" actually means

From a measurement to a message

A modern medical device does more than display a number. To be "connected" it must represent each measurement digitally, name it unambiguously, and emit it over a network in a structure another system can parse. The difference between a device that shows a heart rate and one that integrates is entirely about that structured output.

Three layers do the work. First, a nomenclature says what was measured — that this value is a systolic pressure, not a diastolic one. Second, a message or resource format carries the value, its units, a timestamp and a device identifier. Third, a connectivity pathway physically moves it. Get all three right and a reading can flow from the bedside into the chart with no one re-typing it — which is both faster and far less error-prone than manual entry.

Fig.Security
Security

An endpoint on the network is an endpoint to protect

The moment a device joins a network it becomes part of the organisation's attack surface. Connected devices vary widely in how current their software is and how they authenticate, which makes endpoint security a first-class concern rather than an afterthought.

Sound practice treats device traffic like any other clinical data flow: encrypted in transit, segmented onto controlled network zones, authenticated at the integration boundary, and logged so that every reading has a verifiable origin. None of this is device-specific advice — it is the same privacy-and-security discipline that governs the rest of health data exchange, applied to a class of endpoints that historically received less of it.

Reference

Frequently asked questions

01Why are there both HL7 v2 and FHIR for device data?

HL7 v2 is mature and deeply embedded in hospital systems, so most acute-care device integration still runs on it via the ORU message and IHE Patient Care Device profiles. FHIR is the newer API-based standard, well suited to home and wearable devices. They are complementary; many organisations run both.

02What does IEEE 11073 add that HL7 doesn't?

IEEE 11073 provides a standardised nomenclature — agreed codes naming each measured parameter — and device communication profiles. Many bedside monitors and infusion devices have signals that LOINC does not yet cover, and IEEE 11073 nomenclature supplies standardised codes for them. It sits alongside HL7 and FHIR rather than replacing either.

03Does AzHeC recommend specific connected devices?

No. This is educational, vendor-neutral content about how device data integrates with the record and the exchange. It does not evaluate or recommend any product or manufacturer.

ARIZONA HEALTH INTEROPERABILITY· COUNCIL ·
Get in touch

Continue through the Connected Devices work area

Next, see how a captured reading is mapped, validated and filed in the electronic health record — and how to keep clinicians from drowning in data.